John Adams, Professor Emeritus of Geography, Planning and Public
Affairs, University of Minnesota
metro economies employ creativity, entrepreneurship, hard work
A Civic CaucusFocus on CompetitivenessInterview August 16, 2013
Adams, Dave Broden, Pat Davies, Paul Gilje (coordinator), Sallie
Kemper, Dan Loritz (chair), Tim McDonald, Paul Ostrow, Dana Schroeder,
Clarence Shallbetter, Fred Zimmerman. By phone: Randy Johnson.
: States don't have economies;
metropolitan regions have economies, says John Adams, Professor
Emeritus of Geography, Planning and Public Affairs at the University
of Minnesota. States have budgets, not economies, he says, while
metropolitan areas are economic building blocks of the national
Adams describes three main ways for a
metropolitan economy to support itself: (1) the Bernie Madoff, or
theft, model, in which cartels act to curtail competition and to
charge prices higher than an authentic free-market price; (2) the
Steve Jobs, or innovation and production model, which is based on
creativity, entrepreneurship and hard work; and (3) the lottery model,
based on luck, in which a region sells its unearned wealth in exchange
for products and services imported from elsewhere. He says the
healthiest regions support themselves with the innovation and
production model. The Madoff and lottery models undermine economic
health, promote inequality in society and curtail economic growth.
He points out that businesses have both
profit and loss statements and balance sheets each year, while
governments look only at whether revenues-in match expenditures-out.
Without balance sheets, governments don't account for depreciation or
for future liabilities, such as debt or pension obligations.
Adams concludes that a negative trend is
that we're moving away from an economy of earning money to an
economy of making money. But a positive trend is an increasing
attention to thinking in balance sheet terms about what we do today
and its implications for tomorrow.
: John S. Adams is Professor
Emeritus of Geography, Planning and Public Affairs at the University
of Minnesota. His research interests include the American city,
regional economic development, intra-urban migration, housing markets,
urban transportation and urban development in the U.S., the former
USSR and modern Russia. He continues to work closely with the
Minnesota Population Center, is working on higher education reform in
Minnesota and is president of the University of Minnesota Retirees
Adams served several times as chair of the
University's Geography Department. After retiring from the department
in 2007, he served as Interim Associate Dean of the Humphrey School of
Public Affairs in 2007 and 2008. He directed the University's Urban
Studies Program from 1974 through 1979 and served as acting director
of the Master of Planning Program from 1971 through 1973.
Adams also taught at Pennsylvania State
University; was visiting professor in Poland, in Vienna, at the U.S.
Military Academy at West Point and at the University of Washington;
and was Fulbright Professor of Geography at Moscow State University.
He was a National Science Foundation research fellow at the Institute
of Urban and Regional Development at the University of California at
Berkeley and economic geographer in residence at the Bank of America
world headquarters in San Francisco.
He received his B.A. in economics and
mathematics from the University of St. Thomas and his M.A. in
economics and statistics and his Ph.D. in economic geography from the
University of Minnesota.
In a fair and efficient economy, parties
are informed, transactions are voluntary and benefits are equal on
both sides of the transaction. John Adams, Professor Emeritus of
Geography, Planning and Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota,
started out saying that each of the tenets in this overlying economic
principle must be met for the economy to operate fairly and
Adams divided the rest of his remarks into
three parts: (1) how metropolitan systems support themselves
economically; (2) the pervasiveness of rent seeking and rent capture;
and (3) the "Regional Balance Sheet" concept and defects in the Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) concept.
Part I. How metro systems support themselves
States don't have economies; metropolitan
regions have economies. Adams said states have budgets, not
economies. The metro area, on the other hand, is an economic building
block of our national economy. What's going on in metro areas is a
consequence of very large forces operating on companies, on
individuals, on households and on government.
There are three main ways to support a metro
(1) The Bernie Madoff, or theft, model.
Adams gave the example of the Pittsburgh-Plus steel-pricing cartel in
the 1880s and after, which was devised by Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan
and others as a way of punishing the South after the Civil War and of
preventing competition from potential steel production in Birmingham,
Alabama, and elsewhere. The robber barons decided that steel produced
anywhere in the U.S. had to be priced equal to that produced in
Pittsburgh plus the transportation cost from Pittsburgh to that
producer's local market. If the steel producers didn't cooperate,
Carnegie and the others would run them out of business. As a result,
Pittsburgh's regional economy boomed.
He offered another example: Local real
estate brokers who agree that they will all charge a six or seven
percent commission are essentially acting as a cartel.
Adams noted that when monopolies and
oligopolies act to curtail competition and to charge prices higher
than an authentic free-market price, buyers are robbed, receiving few
or no benefits in the transaction, and the robbers make lots of money,
for a while.
(2) The Steve Jobs, or innovation and
production, model. It's based mainly on creativity,
entrepreneurship and hard work.
Adams offered the example of Minneapolis
flour milling after 1870. Local companies pioneered in figuring out
how to grind hard spring wheat grown in Minnesota and the Dakotas and
then to separate the pieces of brittle bran from the white flour. That
turned the nutritious spring wheat into the premium bread ingredient,
which the millers sold at higher prices all over the world for several
decades. The millers also replaced the traditional stone mill wheels
with porcelain and steel rollers, which cut costs and improved
quality. This led to the large milling fortunes here.
(3) The lottery model. In this model,
which is based on luck, a region sells its unearned wealth in exchange
for products and services imported from elsewhere. As an example,
Adams noted that the economic boom in the Williston oil basin in North
Dakota is caused by the sale of unearned wealth in oil and gas. The
lottery model involves making money (transferring wealth), rather than
earning money (by creating new wealth).
This is known as "economic rent." Economic
rent is any unearned income that arises from conditions of exclusivity
or scarcity. (Economic rent should not be confused with the more
common term "rent," which refers to a payment made for temporary use
of an asset or property, such as paying rent to a landlord in order to
live in an apartment.)
For example, economic rent is reflected in
the huge salaries made by star athletes, who are scarce, versus an
average person. It also explains the high value of assets like patents
and permits, which lead to scarcity or exclusivity.
The healthiest regional economies support
themselves by the innovation and production model, in which something
new and valuable is produced. Most regional economies, though, are
mixes of all three models.
Part II. The pervasiveness of rent seeking
and rent capture.
The Madoff model and the lottery model are
based on rent seeking. Special interests engage in rent seeking
when they figure out how to get benefits for themselves, usually
through the political arena, without giving something equal back to
the system. They typically do so by getting a subsidy or a tariff for
a good they produce or by getting a special regulation that hampers
their competitors. These activities don't create any benefit for
society, thus violating the equal-benefits-to-both-sides-of-a
transaction tenet of a fair and efficient economy; they just
redistribute resources from taxpayers to the special-interest group.
Adams gave the following examples of rent
seeking and rent capture: when certain interest groups, through
pressure and lobbying, that is, rent seeking, convince the rest of us
to give something away (like grazing rights or water from an aquifer)
or to legislate subsidies (such as for federal flood insurance) or to
grant restrictions (like sugar restrictions). We then allow the groups
to make money off these actions, that is, to capture the economic rent
that has been created. The narrow group of people who receive the
benefit are very successful in convincing the rest of us that it's in
the public's interest to allow things to operate this way.
He pointed out, though, that some
restrictions can be positive. Patents and copyrights, he said, are a
good way of rewarding people for a certain period of years for
inventing new things.
Rent seeking and rent capture undermine
economic health, promote inequality in society and curtail economic
growth. Adams said if economic rents were taxed, they wouldn't
disappear altogether, but the reduced size of the rents would help
redirect the use of capital elsewhere and improve the economy's
efficiency and productivity. Rent seeking and rent capture in so many
parts of our economy divert resources into places that promote
additional rent capture, rather than focusing them into a place that's
really productive and that allows healthy economic expansion and
Part III. The "Regional Balance Sheet"
concept and defects in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) concept.
Some people believe that the concept of the
GDP is defective, because it's steering us in directions that are
helping the GDP, but eroding the national balance sheet. The GDP
was defined in the 1930s as a set of economic flows: essentially,
consumption spending per year + new investment put in place
each year + government spending each year. Adams said the
country had a very strong balance sheet in the early Depression years,
but we were experiencing a slowdown in investment, credit tightening
by the banks and a drop in consumer expenditures.
Assets in each region included human
capital, natural resources, the built environment, and local
institutions, such as governments, laws, traditions, schools, colleges
and universities, human service professions, churches, etc. We took
those assets for granted and accepted the advice of people like John
Maynard Keynes, who said the flows were inadequate and that we needed
to step up the flows to get people working again.
The policy response from the Roosevelt
Administration was to promote more spending by consumers, businesses
and government. The consequence, Adams said, is that we've been
thinking that way ever since. But in 2013, that line of thinking has
serious flaws, he said. According to the GDP concept, $1 spent on
prisons is just as valuable as $1 spent on preschool education.
Governments act as though it shouldn't make any difference, as long as
the flows are enhanced. Or policymakers believe a "cash for clunkers"
program, that is, destroying assets to stimulate cash flow, is a good
Stepped up cash flow is not the same as
economic development. If you really believe in the GDP concept and
forget about the balance sheet notion, Adams said, there should be a
law that as soon as your car is seven years old, you should have to
run it off a cliff. That way you'd have to buy a new car and that
would be good for the economy. "But that overlooks the fact that
you've destroyed one of your assets," he said.
Governments don't have balance sheets; they
have budgets. They figure if revenues-in equal expenditures-out, then
the budget is balanced.
Businesses have profit and loss statements
and balance sheets. Adams noted that a balance sheet is a financial
statement prepared at the end of the year, listing assets, liabilities
and the net worth of a household or business. The goal is to have a
better balance sheet this year than last year.
In a business, depreciation is treated as a
cost. For example, if a machine should last five years, then a
business depreciates it every year for five years and treats that as a
cost against the business's revenue. The value of the asset
Governments don't take depreciation into
account. "Their annual budgets are misleading and I think they're
downright dishonest," Adams said. "If a business failed to depreciate
its machines, it would overstate its profits and it would look
healthier than it really is. But that's what governments do."
If a business has an account payable or an
employee pension obligation, it goes on the balance sheet as a
Governments don't do that with pensions and
other obligations, so we can't tell if we're better off or worse off
at the end of the year.
A negative trend is that we're moving away
from an economy of earning money to an economy of making money. But a
positive trend is an increasing attention to thinking in balance sheet
terms about what we do today and its implications for tomorrow.
Adams said we must make sure that as
individuals, families, communities, states and a nation:
1. We pay full price for what we get, with
no subsidies and no rents; and
2. We make no overpayments: no graft, no
sweetheart contracts, no excessive pay or
benefits, which is
another form of rent capture.
The large forces that have been building up
for the past 40 years include the rampant spread of rent seeking and
organizations try to put themselves in a protected position (through
monopoly, cartels, patents, political action, government rules and
regulations, occupational licensing), so they will be compensated well
for their work, without regard to the value to society of what they
These practices ensure three outcomes:
(1) increasing inequality in economic circumstances; (2) increasing
stagnation of the economy; and (3) increasing polarization in politics
that keeps the one percent strong, while using their resources to
convince the 99 percent that what's happening is in their interest.
As long as we allow rent seeking and rent
capture to proceed, it'll create huge incentives for people to do
exactly that. In response to a question, Adams said that when
we're talking about how the metro economy is working today and how it
should work down the road to make us effective and competitive, we
must look at the sources of income today. How much is based on rent
seeking and how much on creativity and ingenuity?
Entrepreneurs are limited in what they can
do, because we're not investing early enough to create the
entrepreneurs of tomorrow. He said the Washington, D.C., economy
has flourished by the growing presence of special interests seeking
rent capture. "That's not a productivity business," he said. "It
leaves behind an underinvestment in young people to create the
entrepreneurs, the business leaders and the productivity of tomorrow."
More and more people feel entitled to what
they're getting, rather than feeling that what they get has to be
earned. An interviewer noted that people now seem to feel less
discomfort with collecting a paycheck whether or not they've earned
it. Adams said managers and leaders must tell people that being a
public employee is a public trust: it's your obligation to deliver
equal to what's being given to you. "When public employees become a
major political block, voting to ensure that what they get continues
on their terms," he said, "the system has become corrupted."
Smaller cities in Minnesota have their own
economies. Adams said the Rochester region, the Marshall region,
the Duluth region and the Roseau region are all smaller versions of
the Twin Cities, with their own economies. He noted that Rochester,
for example, has an economy, but he asked how much of that economy is
based on quality research that's improving the effectiveness and
efficiency of health care down the road and how much is based on doing
routine, overpriced medical procedures.
Governments could be required to have
balance sheets. Adams said the Government Accounting Standards
Board is "inching" into that in the transportation area. He said it's
important to think in balance sheet terms: is it improving or
declining? "If it's improving because we're doing a better job of
competing with the rest of the world by supporting ourselves in honest
ways, that's good," he said. "If we're competing because we've learned
how to rip off the rest of the world, that's bad. It's not long-term
Agriculture is one of Minnesota's major
industries. Adams said when it's done well, that is, with the
agricultural producers absorbing the full costs of their production,
it's a big part of the economy. "They're doing great if they're not
polluting, if they're not leaving toxic things behind and if they're
not creating too much monoculture, so that we create a bad situation
down the road," he said.
The Civic Caucus
is a non-partisan,
tax-exempt educational organization. The Core participants
include persons of varying political persuasions, reflecting years of leadership in politics and
business. Click here
to see a short personal background of each.
David Broden, Janis Clay, Bill Frenzel, Paul Gilje,
Jan Hively, Dan Loritz (Chair), Marina Lyon, Joe Mansky,
Tim McDonald, John Mooty, Jim Olson, Wayne Popham and